If Brave used the microphone to collect surrounding discussions at all time to target their ads client side, that would be *not a privacy concern at all*. I am sure many of you are buying their sales pitch.īy their redefinition, if Brave accessed all your private files on your computer to target their ads client side, that would be *not a privacy concern at all*. I feel that it really needs to be insisted on how scummy this new definition of privacy by Brave is, because I don’t think you guys really understand what this implies. “Ad targeting happens client side, no data leaves your computer, itâ€™s not a privacy concern at all.” Before talking you should learn then when you’re scummy enough, clarifying what your company is doing might actually damage your revenue. I wasn’t aware that Brave was still keeping donations that they claim are intended for sites, thanks for informing all of us on this. “You could have easily looked this up, but you chose not to. You brave shill now explains with a smile that they *still keep it* (and do whatever they want with it afterwards but do not give it to the sites that they were intended for). I thought that after the scandal it made, they had just stopped taking donations for sites that they would keep for themselves in fact. “And all donations that donâ€™t go through are spread across other Brave users as free token grants, Brave doesnâ€™t keep them.” While we discuss it they make money by advertisers from users browsing data. Brave’s opinion, neglecting to even discuss the objections of the comment your replied to.

Brave browser old version